What Canon Cameras Shot 120fps
Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
I accept the current firmware one.3.ane.
I am able to set my camera to record in 4KU @ 119.9 FPS ALL-I
I am using a Scandisk Extreme Pro CFexpress 128GB card
When I tape, the screen shows that I am recording the above settings, but when I review on the screen, is displays I shot in 4KU @29.97 ALL-I. Besides when I attempt to import into Premier Pro, it imports at 29.97 FPS.
I am new to video, and then hoping this is a user error. Any help would exist appreciated.
Thanks
moon1029 • Regular Member • Posts: 303
Re: Trouble with 120 FPS recording on R5
ane
the footage is slowed down to 1/4 of the original speed.
Catechism EOS R5 Canon EOS R6 Canon 85mm F1.4L IS USM Catechism RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF lxx-200 F4 50 +half dozen more
OP emileder • New Member • Posts: 5
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
Thanks moon1029! Withal confused. I looked at video on YouTube and most showed the footage existence imported as 120, not 29.9. By sampling it downward to 1/4, practise you still have the frames from the 120? Thanks once more
Markr041 • Veteran Member • Posts: 9,448
Re: Trouble with 120 FPS recording on R5
- emileder wrote:
Cheers moon1029! Notwithstanding dislocated. I looked at video on YouTube and most showed the footage beingness imported as 120, not 29.nine. By sampling it down to 1/four, exercise yous withal have the frames from the 120? Thanks again
No. The camera has created a 30p video, and that'due south what you accept. The 4K 120p video is the weakest capability of the camera - you exercise non have choices of recording frame rates (merely 30p or 25p PAL), there is a 7 and a half minute recording time limit, and the camera uses line skipping to achieve the 4K resolution.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Panasonic LX100 Sony RX100 Four Panasonic ZS100 Olympus TG-5 +14 more
Ali • Senior Member • Posts: i,813
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
Markr041 wrote:
- emileder wrote:
Thanks moon1029! Nonetheless confused. I looked at video on YouTube and most showed the footage being imported as 120, not 29.ix. By sampling it down to 1/4, do y'all still accept the frames from the 120? Thank you again
No. The camera has created a 30p video, and that's what you have.
But you do have all the frames right? The result is a 1/iv slower movie that is 4x the length of the original recording. Simply all 120 frames per second that were recorded should be at that place.
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V Olympus TG-v Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5
Markr041 • Veteran Member • Posts: 9,448
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
Ali wrote:
Markr041 wrote:
- emileder wrote:
Thanks moon1029! Still confused. I looked at video on YouTube and most showed the footage existence imported as 120, not 29.9. Past sampling information technology down to ane/4, do you still have the frames from the 120? Cheers again
No. The camera has created a 30p video, and that'south what yous accept.
But y'all do have all the frames right? The event is a 1/4 slower movie that is 4x the length of the original recording. Just all 120 frames per second that were recorded should exist there.
You have 30 frames per second and the full video has all the frames that were recorded, if that is what y'all mean. And then, if you shot 4 seconds at 120 fps, y'all would have 480 frames. If the recording was at 24 fps, you would have 20 seconds of 24p video = all 480 frames!
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Panasonic LX100 Sony RX100 IV Panasonic ZS100 Olympus TG-five +14 more
Ali • Senior Member • Posts: 1,813
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
Markr041 wrote:
Ali wrote:
Markr041 wrote:
- emileder wrote:
Cheers moon1029! Even so confused. I looked at video on YouTube and most showed the footage being imported as 120, not 29.9. Past sampling it down to 1/4, do you still have the frames from the 120? Thanks over again
No. The photographic camera has created a 30p video, and that's what you have.
But yous exercise have all the frames right? The result is a 1/4 slower movie that is 4x the length of the original recording. But all 120 frames per 2d that were recorded should be there.
You have thirty frames per second and the full video has all the frames that were recorded, if that is what you lot mean.
Indeed, that is what I meant, and that is what the OP was asking about, I think. Thanks for confirming!
So, if y'all shot 4 seconds at 120 fps, y'all would take 480 frames. If the recording was at 24 fps, you would accept 20 seconds of 24p video = all 480 frames!
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V Olympus TG-5 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 Canon EOS M6 Ii Canon EOS R5
Wing2 • Regular Member • Posts: 480
Re: Trouble with 120 FPS recording on R5
emileder wrote:
Thanks moon1029! Still confused. I looked at video on YouTube and most showed the footage being imported as 120, not 29.9. Past sampling it down to 1/4, exercise you still have the frames from the 120? Cheers once more
All the frames are at that place - just playing back at 30fps. If your shot duration was iv seconds , the playback time becomes 16 seconds. Y'all can easily modify the frame charge per unit to say 60fps or 24 fps by changing the sequence setting in Premiere Pro.
OP emileder • New Fellow member • Posts: 5
Re: Trouble with 120 FPS recording on R5
Thanks everyone for the explanation. I tin work with this. I am not certain why they did it this way.
PicPocket • Veteran Member • Posts: five,247
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
emileder wrote:
Thanks everyone for the caption. I can work with this. I am not sure why they did information technology this way.
For playback compatibility. This would work with virtually devices fifty-fifty if they are non high frame rate aware. For software that is aware of HFR, you can always speed up the timeline. Well-nigh people shooting 120fps today are anyhow looking for boring mo anyhow
Canon EOS R5 Catechism EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Sigma 135mm F1.8 Fine art Canon RF lxx-200mm F2.8L IS USM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM +13 more
OP emileder • New Member • Posts: v
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
Thanks for the input!
Re: Trouble with 120 FPS recording on R5
Ali wrote:
Markr041 wrote:
- emileder wrote:
Thanks moon1029! Still confused. I looked at video on YouTube and about showed the footage being imported as 120, not 29.9. By sampling information technology downwards to 1/4, do you still have the frames from the 120? Thanks again
No. The camera has created a 30p video, and that's what you accept.
Simply you do have all the frames right? The result is a one/4 slower movie that is 4x the length of the original recording. But all 120 frames per second that were recorded should be there.
It should be easy plenty to change the video or a copy of information technology (more safe) to 120fps without resampling it, with the right software. Information technology's a lot like changing PPI in an image editing program without resampling the image, per se.
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
emileder wrote:
Cheers everyone for the explanation. I tin can work with this. I am not certain why they did information technology this way.
A very narrow scope on Canon's office, possibly.
Conspicuously, in that location are displays capable of playing back the video at a normal cadence at 120fps (I was doing 166Hz animation xx years agone with a CRT in low-res!), and then the assumption that 120fps can only exist for dull-move is absurd. Even if existing displays topped out at 60fps or 30fps, recording at 120fps and resampling time-wise equally needed would allow much more than flexibility in the smoothness or pulsation of move for desired furnishings, in editing.
OP emileder • New Member • Posts: 5
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
Absolutely! I would prefer making those decisions myself, and non the manufacture. Fifty-fifty though the work around will accomplish the same finish result, getting there is a waste of energy and time.
Markr041 • Veteran Member • Posts: 9,448
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
emileder wrote:
Absolutely! I would adopt making those decisions myself, and not the manufacture. Even though the work around will accomplish the same end result, getting there is a waste of energy and time.
On the Sony a7s iii, you tin can shoot at 120 fps and independently choose your recording frame rate amidst 120 fps (existent time with audio), threescore fps, 30 fps, or 24 fps. Yous make the selection, the camera does the piece of work. And, btw, the Sony 120fps is higher quality than the Catechism 120 also because it does non line skip. I have the R5 and the Sony.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Panasonic LX100 Sony RX100 Four Panasonic ZS100 Olympus TG-5 +14 more
Wing2 • Regular Member • Posts: 480
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
1
1 technical reason I can retrieve of for Canon making it 30fps is, R5'south 4K120 data compression ratio is kind of low (=higher quality) At 1880Mbps continuous data rate, (some slower storage devices may not even exist able to read information technology fast plenty) many computers will take trouble displaying without drop frame at full 120 Hz playback speed.
Markr041 • Veteran Member • Posts: 9,448
Re: Problem with 120 FPS recording on R5
Wing2 wrote:
One technical reason I tin think of for Canon making it 30fps is, R5's 4K120 data compression ratio is kind of low (=higher quality) At 1880Mbps continuous data rate, (some slower storage devices may non even exist able to read it fast enough) many computers will have trouble displaying without drop frame at full 120 Hz playback speed.
That does not explain why there are no options for 24 fps or 30fps recording. The loftier bitrate comes in function from the disability to shrink more because of overheating. The Sony fx3 bitrate for 4K 120p is 1200 mbps all-i, and it is higher quality than that from the R5, and yous can shoot and record at 120 fps. I love the R5 only the 120p is a weak spot, though it is far from bad.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Panasonic LX100 Sony RX100 IV Panasonic ZS100 Olympus TG-v +14 more
Wing2 • Regular Member • Posts: 480
Re: Trouble with 120 FPS recording on R5
Markr041 wrote:
Wing2 wrote:
Ane technical reason I can think of for Canon making it 30fps is, R5's 4K120 data pinch ratio is kind of low (=college quality) At 1880Mbps continuous data rate, (some slower storage devices may not even be able to read it fast enough) many computers will have trouble displaying without drib frame at total 120 Hz playback speed.
The high bitrate comes in role from the inability to compress more considering of overheating.
All-i (unlike H.265) is simple prototype pinch, higher or picayune compression ratio does non outcome in a big deviation in processing power (or heat generated).
However, higher data rate volition definitely generate more heat when writing out the extra information to a ability hungry CFExpress carte.
So if what Canon want was to reduce overheat, they should increase the pinch ratio instead of reducing it. It won't help likewise much though, then Catechism terminate upwardly opt for better quality video instead.
At 1880 Mbps we are still talking about a compression ratio of virtually 8:ane for x bit 422 video. This pinch ratio is almost the aforementioned as typical Catechism R5 S1 size jpeg file. (jpeg is 8 flake 444, contains more than data per pixel than 10 bit 422 though)
8:1 pinch ratio for video is very low, but non uselessly depression. It will work well fifty-fifty when shooting complicated fast changing scenes (120fps normally ways fast activity, non necessarily complicated though) - not so certain for video at higher compression ratio.
Keyboard shortcuts:
F Forum Thousand My threads
Latest sample galleries
Latest in-depth reviews
Sony has just released a trio of impressively small, light, ultrawide lenses for APS-C. These lenses are designed for vloggers, so Chris decided to pic himself and find out how they perform.
Holy moly, this matter is tiny! We take the adorable Sigma sixteen-28mm F2.8 DG DN Gimmicky around Calgary to run across how it performs.
The Fujifilm X-H2S is the company's latest APS-C flagship, using a 26MP Stacked CMOS sensor to evangelize the fastest shooting, best autofocus and most all-encompassing video specs of whatever X-serial camera all the same. Here'due south what's new and what nosotros think and then far...
We've been able to spend some quality time with Fujifilm's APS-C flagship, and we take enough of opinions!
How do you lot make weird lens fifty-fifty weirder? Put a periscope on it! We bank check out the new Laowa Periprobe 24mm F14 2X and explore some of the creative things you lot can do with such a baroque lens.
Latest ownership guides
What'south the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, atmospheric condition-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites.
What's the all-time camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Most modern cameras will shoot video to one caste or some other, only these are the ones nosotros'd look at if you plan to shoot some video aslope your photos. We've chosen cameras that can take swell photos and get in easy to get neat looking video, rather than being the ones you'd cull as a committed videographer.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that brand it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
Source: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4593327
Posted by: lozathatrated.blogspot.com
0 Response to "What Canon Cameras Shot 120fps"
Post a Comment